從律師助理到執業律師︰杰出(chu)律師成長之路——優秀資(zi)料大匯總 付英老師︰司jiu)家(jia)贍鹽wen)題解答&經典案例解析(xi)&教(jiao)學(xue)輔導匯總(葵花2000人Q群,招新同學(xue)奮戰2016,群han)hao)36052508,名稱︰司jiu)跡  隊 憒chuang)) 與葵花同行,讓(rang)理想閃光!體驗全面更新的葵花司jiu)莢諳嚀飪ku)(免費(fei)版),穩穩當當金榜題名!
葵花第313期辯論大賽打(da)擂中!蘭州市(shi)民可以起訴自來水公司嗎? 律師被難日國民遭殃時!薄(bo)熙(xi)來、李莊(zhuang)、黎(li)慶(qing)洪、北海律師、谷開來、王(wang)立軍全案追蹤(及時bei)攏/font> [葵花法律大講堂]葵花付英律師涉外課件系列(lie)︰跨國並購基(ji)本概念(大匯總)
孔慶(qing)東是不(bu)是最大的漢(han)奸︰看付英和司馬(ma)南PK鳳凰(huang)節目搜狐視(shi)頻 中國律師與律所營銷研(yan)究(jiu)、培訓及應用——經典大盤點 請捐助葵花——Your donation makes all the difference
王(wang)者之卷,誰與爭鋒——葵花高(gao)階教(jiao)程(八(ba)大本),連續11年修訂出(chu)版。當你看各類專題、講義(yi)糊涂時,當你做題焦頭爛額時,它能為你省去在學(xue)習(xi)中為求證(zheng)而查閱法規(gui)匯編、各類教(jiao)材資(zi)料的過程,實現真正減(jian)負。 〔葵花法律網〕備(bei)戰2016年司jiu)跡  計鷙嚼la)!葵花部分書籍半價賣(mai)了(liao)!第一(yi)步︰司jiu)際榧 」褐改希 xiang)細查看︰ 巨人之肩,舍我其誰——葵花《全真題庫(ku)分類詳(xiang)解、《模擬考場(chang)沖刺套卷(全真版)》,是迄(qi)今市(shi)場(chang)上唯(wei)一(yi)做到全面舊題新解的權威題集(ji)。葵花《同步經典題庫(ku)》,全面歸納必考考點、一(yi)網打(da)盡必考考點!
查看: 714回(hui)復(fu): 0


發表于 2020-04-04 06:47:58只看該作者回(hui)帖獎勵倒序瀏覽閱讀模式
7 e' b4 l* Z* `4 e5 a1 q+ Y# V: P' m/ @& b
PER CURIAM法庭一(yi)致通過
  s- i, k' D! d3 e; _
: S' ?& f  Y0 c- s% bChateau des Charmes Wines, Ltd. (“Chateau des Charmes”), a Canadian company, appeals the dismissal of its action for breach of contract and related claims arising out of its purchase of wine corks from Sabat , S.A. (“Sabat  France”), a French company, and Sabat  USA, Inc. (“Sabat  USA”), a wholly owned California subsidiary. The district court held that forum selection clauses in the invoices that Sabat  France sent to Chateau des Charmes were part of the contract between the parties and dismissed the case in favor of adjudication in France. Because we conclude that the forum selection clauses in question were not part of any agreement between the parties, we reverse./ k2 y3 q* B, d# A
0 I! ^$ I! J' w, c. u
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY案件事實及原審(shen)情況5 ]' l- V( B! ?" N& q/ j  k$ R" I
! t. e8 h7 R' w. I& `5 F6 Y6 @0 p
The material facts pertinent to this appeal are not disputed.1 Sabat  France manufactures and sells special wine corks that it claims will not cause wines to be spoiled by “cork taint,” a distasteful flavor that some corks produce. It sells these corks through a wholly owned California subsidiary, Sabat  USA.
0 q. R7 C/ m9 ^% f; B- d' W. C1 Y5 H: `7 f( x7 k
In February 2000, after some preliminary discussions about the characteristics of Sabat ’s corks, Chateau des Charmes, a winery from Ontario, Canada, agreed by telephone with Sabat  USA to purchase a certain number of corks at a specific price. The parties agreed on payment and shipping terms. No other terms were discussed, nor did the parties have any history of prior dealings. Later that year, Chateau des Charmes placed a second telephone order for corks on the same terms. In total, Chateau des Charmes ordered 1.2 million corks.
* c; F! q1 Q- k7 J
3 e  n: Z- g# ~7 h5 ]  r' {6 y! BSabat  France shipped the corks to Canada in eleven shipments. For each shipment, Sabat  France also sent an invoice. Some of the invoices arrived before the shipments, some with the shipments, and some after the shipments. On the face of each invoice was a paragraph in French that specified that “Any dispute arising under the present contract is under the sole jurisdiction of the Court of Commerce of the City of Perpignan.” On the back of each invoice a number of provisions were printed in French, including a clause that specified that “any disputes arising out of this agreement shall be brought before the court with jurisdiction to try the matter in the judicial district where Seller’s registered office is located.” Chateau des Charmes duly took delivery and paid for each shipment of corks. The corks were then used to bottle Chateau des Charmes’ wines.
; e! e9 q' k) K( `! c% ~: n' F/ G! k: u
Chateau des Charmes claims that, in 2001, it noticed that the wine bottled with Sabat ’s corks was tainted by cork flavors. Chateau des Charmes filed suit in federal district court in California against Sabat  France and Sabat   USA alleging claims *530 for breach of contract, strict liability, breach of warranty, false advertising, and unfair competition. Sabat  France and Sabat  USA filed a motion to dismiss based on the forum selection clauses. The district court held that the forum selection clauses were valid and enforceable and dismissed the action. This appeal ensued.1 }' y+ z1 Z- ^. D
您需(xu)要(yao)登錄後(hou)才可以回(hui)帖 登錄 注(zhu)冊


QQ聯(lian)系我們小黑屋手機(ji)版葵花法律( 京(jing)ICP備(bei)17074557號(hao) )京(jing)公網安(an)備(bei)11010702001897號(hao) 

GMT+8, 2020-04-04 06:47, Processed in 0.074735 second(s), 20 queries.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

500万彩票网官网首页 | 下一页